Short communication / Open Access

DOI: 10.31488/HEPH.186

New Approaches for Hindfoot Pain Telerehabilitation

Elif Tugce Cil

University, Faculty of Health Science, Istanbul, Turkey

*Corresponding author: Elif Tugce Cil, Yeditepe, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department Yeditepe University, Faculty of Health Science, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

Hindfoot pain, commonly associated with conditions such as plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendonitis, and posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, poses significant challenges for patients and healthcare providers alike. Traditional in-person rehabilitation programs often require frequent clinic visits, making it inconvenient for patients and potentially limiting access to care. However, with the advancements in telehealth and digital technologies, new approaches for hindfoot pain telerehabilitation have emerged. This article aims to explore the emerging trends and innovative strategies in the field of telerehabilitation specifically tailored for hindfoot pain management. The utilization of telecommunication platforms, mobile applications, wearable devices, and remote monitoring systems have opened up opportunities for patients to receive timely and personalized care from the comfort of their own homes.

Keywords: E-health, foot, hindfoot pain, telerehabilitation

Introduction

Hindfoot pain is a common condition that affects many people worldwide [1]. It can result from a variety of causes such as injuries, overuse, medical conditions, or poor footwear [2]. Common types of hindfoot pain include plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendonitis, tarsal tunnel syndrome and posterior tibial tendon dysfunction [3]. Traditional rehabilitation for hindfoot pain often involves a combination of exercises, manual therapy, and modalities such as heat or ice. However, with the recent advances in technology, new approaches for hindfoot pain telerehabilitation have emerged [4-6].

One of the newest approaches is the use of wearable devices such as smart insoles or sensors that can track foot movements and provide real-time feedback to patients and healthcare providers. These devices can be paired with mobile apps or online platforms, allowing patients to receive personalized exercises and treatments remotely [7,8]. Another approach is the use of virtual reality (VR) technology, which can create immersive environments that simulate real-life scenarios. VR can be used to provide patients with exercises and activities that target specific areas of the foot, while also providing visual and audio feedback to help with technique and motivation [8,9]. Telerehabilitation can also be used for remote monitoring of patient progress, allowing healthcare providers to track their patients' adherence to treatment plans and adjust them accordingly. This can be especially beneficial for patients who live in remote areas or have limited access to healthcare services [10]. Telerehabilitation can be combined with telemedicine, which involves the use of video conferencing and other communication technologies to provide medical consultations and assessments remotely. It is useful for patients who require medical intervention in addition to rehabilitation, such as those with diabetic foot ulcers or other complications [11].

New approaches for hindfoot pain telerehabilitation are emerging, leveraging wearable devices, virtual reality technology, and remote monitoring. These new approaches can provide patients with personalized and engaging rehabilitation programs, while also allowing healthcare providers to remotely monitor and adjust their treatment plans. While these technologies are promising, it is important to remember that they should be used in conjunction with traditional rehabilitation methods and under the guidance of a qualified healthcare Professional [12,13].

Some of the telerehabilitation modalities are:

Wearable Devices

Wearable devices such as smart insoles or sensors are becoming increasingly popular in the field of hindfoot pain rehabilitation. These devices are placed inside the patient's shoes and can track foot movements and provide real-time feedback to patients and healthcare providers. The data collected by these devices can be used to create personalized treatment plans and exercises. Wearable devices can also be used to monitor patient progress and adherence to treatment plans [14]. Smart insoles, for example, can provide patients with feedback on their foot pressure distribution, gait patterns, and stride length. They can also alert patients and healthcare providers to changes in foot pressure that may indicate an increased risk of developing pressure ulcers or other foot injuries [15]. Sensors can be attached to the skin or to a specific area of the foot to monitor foot movements and provide real-time feedback. This feedback can be used to improve patient technique and motivation, and to prevent further injury or pain [16].

Virtual Reality Technology

Virtual reality (VR) technology is another promising approach to hindfoot pain rehabilitation. VR can create immersive environments that simulate real-life scenarios, allowing patients to perform exercises and activities that target specific areas of the foot. The use of VR can also provide patients with visual and audio feedback to help with technique and motivation [17]. In hindfoot pain rehabilitation, VR can be used to provide patients with exercises that target specific areas of the foot, such as the plantar fascia or Achilles tendon. Patients can also perform activities that simulate real-life scenarios, such as walking on uneven surfaces or climbing stairs. VR can also be used to provide patients with relaxation techniques and stress reduction techniques, which can help manage pain and promote healing [18-20].

Remote Monitoring

Remote monitoring is another important aspect of hindfoot pain rehabilitation. With remote monitoring, healthcare providers can track patient progress and adherence to treatment plans remotely. This can be especially beneficial for patients who live in remote areas or have limited access to healthcare services. It can involve the use of wearable devices or online platforms that allow patients to input their progress and communicate with their healthcare providers [21]. Patients can also receive personalized feedback and recommendations from their healthcare providers through these platforms. Remote monitoring can also be used to track patient outcomes, such as pain reduction or improved function. It can be used to adjust treatment plans and to determine the effectiveness of different rehabilitation approaches [22].

In summary, wearable devices, virtual reality technology, and remote monitoring are promising approaches to hindfoot pain rehabilitation. Wearable devices such as smart insoles and sensors can provide real-time feedback to patients and healthcare providers, while virtual reality technology can create immersive environments for patients to perform exercises and activities [23]. Remote monitoring can be used to track patient progress and outcomes, and to adjust treatment plans accordingly. These approaches can provide patients with personalized and engaging rehabilitation programs, while also allowing healthcare providers to remotely monitor and adjust their treatment plans [24].

There is ongoing research on the use of wearable devices, virtual reality technology, and remote monitoring for hindfoot pain rehabilitation. These studies suggest that wearable devices, virtual reality technology, and remote monitoring have the potential to improve pain and function in patients with plantar fasciitis, ankle osteoarthritis ankle instability, and Achilles tendonopathy [25-29]. However, more research is needed to determine the optimal approaches and to better understand the long-term effects of these technologies on patient outcomes. While telerehabilitation for hindfoot pain has many potential benefits, there are also several limitations to consider. One of the main limitations of telerehabilitation for hindfoot pain is the limited physical interaction between the patient and the healthcare provider. This can make it difficult for healthcare providers to accurately assess the patient's condition and to provide hands-on treatment. Another limitation is the potential technological barriers that patients may face. Not all patients may have access to the necessary technology or internet connectivity required for telerehabilitation [4-30]. Additionally, some patients may not be comfortable or familiar with using technology, which can impact their ability to participate in telerehabilitation programs. Telerehabilitation programs may not always provide the same level of personalization as in-person rehabilitation programs. Healthcare providers may have limited ability to customize treatment plans to address the unique needs and preferences of individual patients. Certain exercises and modalities used in hindfoot pain rehabilitation may require specialized equipment that is not easily accessible for patients participating in telerehabilitation programs. There may be concerns around patient privacy and security when using technology for telerehabilitation. It is important to ensure that patient data is protected and that appropriate safeguards are in place to prevent unauthorized access to patient information [5-31]. To sum, while telerehabilitation has many potential benefits for hindfoot pain rehabilitation, it is important to consider the limitations and potential challenges associated with using technology for remote rehabilitation. Healthcare providers should carefully evaluate each patient's needs and determine if telerehabilitation is an appropriate option for their specific condition and circumstances.

The future of hindfoot pain telerehabilitation looks promising, as advances in technology and healthcare delivery continue to expand the possibilities for remote care. As technology continues to advance, it is expected that hindfoot pain telerehabilitation programs will become more personalized. Healthcare providers will be able to leverage data and analytics to better understand each patient's unique needs and to tailor treatment plans accordingly. Wearable devices such as smart insoles and foot sensors have already shown promise in hindfoot pain rehabilitation. In the future, it is expected that telerehabilitation programs will be more seamlessly integrated with these devices, allowing for more accurate and real-time monitoring of patient progress. Virtual reality technology has already been shown to improve pain and function in patients with hindfoot pain. As the technology continues to improve, it is expected that virtual reality-based exercises will become more immersive and engaging, leading to even better patient outcomes. Telerehabilitation has the potential to enable greater collaboration between healthcare providers, including podiatrists, physical therapists, and orthopedic surgeons. This can lead to more coordinated and integrated care, improving patient outcomes and reducing the overall burden on the healthcare system. Continued advancements in technology and healthcare delivery expected to improve patient outcomes and increase access to care.

References

1. Çil E. Hindfoot Pathologies. 2023;. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109784

2. Choo YJ, Park CH, Chang MC. Rearfoot disorders and conservative treatment: a narrative review. 2020;9(5):3546–52.

3. Lawrence SJ, Singhal M. Open hindfoot injuries. 2007;15(6):367–76.

4. Çil ET, Serif T, Şaylı U, Subaşı F. The Effectıveness Of “Dıjıtal Steps” Web Based Telerehabılıtatıon System For Patıent Wıth Hındfoot Paın: A Randomısed Controlled Trıal. 2023;:102040..

5. Jette AM. The promise and potential of telerehabilitation in physical therapy. 2021Jan1;101(3):pzab081.

6. Peretti A, Amenta F, Tayebati SK, Nittari G, Mahdi SS. Telerehabilitation: review of the state-of-the-art and areas of application. 2017;4(2):e7511.

7. Seron P, Oliveros M, Gutierrez-Arias R, Fuentes-Aspe R, Torres-Castro R, Merino-Osorio C, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapy: a rapid overview. 2021 Jul 26;101(6):pzab053.

8. Galiano‐Castillo N, Cantarero‐Villanueva I, Fernández‐Lao C, Ariza‐García A, Díaz‐Rodríguez L, Del‐Moral‐Ávila R, et al. Telehealth system: A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of an internet-based exercise intervention on quality of life, pain, muscle strength, and fatigue in breast cancer survivors. 2016;122(20):3166–74.

9. Pedraza-Hueso M, Martín-Calzón S, Díaz-Pernas FJ, Martínez-Zarzuela M. Rehabilitation using kinect-based games and virtual reality. 2015;75:161–8.

10. Goodridge D, Rogers M, Klassen L, Jeffery B, Knox K, Rohatinsky N, et al. Access to health and support services: perspectives of people living with a long-term traumatic spinal cord injury in rural and urban areas. 2015;37(16):1401–10.

11. Waqar S. Center based verses tele-rehabilitation for diabetes mellitus. 2021;2021(05):190–1.

12. Cottrell MA, Galea OA, O’Leary SP, Hill AJ, Russell TG. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2017;31(5):625–38.

13. Amin J, Ahmad B, Amin S, Siddiqui AA, Alam MK. Rehabilitation Professional and Patient Satisfaction with Telerehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review. 2022;.

14. Ianculescu M, Andrei B, Alexandru A. A smart assistance solution for remotely monitoring the orthopaedic rehabilitation process using wearable technology: Re. flex system. 2019;28(3):317–26.

15. Manupibul U, Charoensuk W, Kaimuk P. Design and development of SMART insole system for plantar pressure measurement in imbalance human body and heavy activities. 2014;:1–5.

16. Chander H, Burch RF, Talegaonkar P, Saucier D, Luczak T, Ball JE, et al. Wearable stretch sensors for human movement monitoring and fall detection in ergonomics. 2020;17(10):3554.

17. Dermody G, Whitehead L, Wilson G, Glass C. The role of virtual reality in improving health outcomes for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review. 2020;22(6):e17331.

18. Gumaa M, Rehan Youssef A. Is virtual reality effective in orthopedic rehabilitation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. 2019;99(10):1304–25.

19. von Willich J, Schmitz M, Müller F, Schmitt D, Mühlhäuser M. Podoportation: Foot-based locomotion in virtual reality. 2020;:1–4.

20. Barrera S, Romanos P, Saito S, Takahashi H, Nakajima M. WARAJI: foot-driven navigation interfaces for virtual reality applications. 2004;5:1–7.

21. Kukreja GS, Alok A, Reddy AK, Nersisson R. IoT based foot neuropathy analysis and remote monitoring of foot pressure and temperature. 2020;:1–6.

22. Vieira LMSMDA, de Andrade MA, Sato TDO. Telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal pain–An overview of systematic reviews. 2023;9:20552076231164242.

23. Lin F, Wang A, Zhuang Y, Tomita MR, Xu W. Smart insole: A wearable sensor device for unobtrusive gait monitoring in daily life. 2016;12(6):2281–91.

24. Almuteb I, Hua R, Wang Y. Smart insoles review over the last two decade: Applications, potentials, and future. 2022;:100301.

25. Brook J, Dauphinee DM, Korpinen J, Rawe IM. Pulsed radiofrequency electromagnetic field therapy: a potential novel treatment of plantar fasciitis. 2012;51(3):312–6.

26. Tilles J, Shaporev A, Reukov V. mHealth musculoskeletal applications: bluetooth low energy devices and android. 2016;:111–2.

27. Pan Q, Long Z, Zhang Z, Lin W, Zhang L, Bai S, et al. Achilles' new heel: Shock absorbing, gait assisting and energy harvesting. 2023;109:108293.

28. Elshazly FAA, Nambi G, Elnegamy TE. Comparative study on virtual reality training (VRT) over sensory motor training (SMT) in unilateral chronic osteoarthritis—A randomized control trial. 2016;5(8):7–16.

29. Oskouei ST, Malliaras P, Hill KD, Clark R, Perraton L. Evaluating daily physical activity and biomechanical measures using wearable technology in people with Achilles tendinopathy: A descriptive exploratory study. 2022;58:102534.

30. Russell TG, Blumke R, Richardson B, Truter P. Telerehabilitation mediated physiotherapy assessment of ankle disorders. 2010;15(3):167–75.

31. Katz NB, Tenforde AS. Telerehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Injuries. 2022;197–212.

Received: May 22, 2024;
Accepted: June 18, 2024;
Published: June 24, 2024 .

To cite this article : Elif Tugce Cil. New Approaches for Hindfoot Pain Telerehabilitation. Health Education and Public Health. 2024; 7(1): 558-560. doi: 10.31488/HEPH.186.

© The Author(s) 2024.